IMIS | Flanders Marine Institute
 

Flanders Marine Institute

Platform for marine research

IMIS

Publications | Institutes | Persons | Datasets | Projects | Maps
[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Printer-friendly version

Conducting ecological risk assessments of inorganic metals and metalloids: Current status
Chapman, P.M.; Wang, F.Y.; Janssen, C.R.; Goulet, RR.; Kamunde, C.N. (2003). Conducting ecological risk assessments of inorganic metals and metalloids: Current status. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 9(4): 641-697
In: Human and Ecological Risk Assessment. Taylor & Francis: Amherst, MA. ISSN 1080-7039, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 
    VLIZ: Open Repository 142321 [ OMA ]

Keywords
    Bioavailability; Ecological risk assessment; Metalloids; Metals; Speciation

Authors  Top 
  • Chapman, P.M.
  • Wang, F.Y.
  • Janssen, C.R., more
  • Goulet, RR.
  • Kamunde, C.N.

Abstract
    Ecological risk assessment (ERA) of inorganic metals and metalloids (metals) must be specific to these substances and cannot be generic because most metals are naturally occurring, some are essential, speciation affects bioavailability, and bioavailability is determined by both external environmental conditions and organism physiological/biological characteristics. Key information required for ERA of metals includes: emissions, pathways, and movements in the environment (Do metals accumulate in biota above background concentrations?); the relationship between internal dose and/or external concentration (Are these metals bioreactive?); and the incidence and severity of any effects (Are bioreactive metals likely to result in adverseor, in the case of essential metals, beneficial effects?) — ground-truthed in contaminated areas by field observations. Specific requirements for metals ERA are delineated for each ERA component (Hazard Identification, Exposure Analysis, Effects Analysis, Risk Characterization), updating Chapman and Wang (2000). In addition, key specific information required for ERA is delineated by major information category (conceptual diagrams, bioavailability, predicted environmental concentration [PEC], predicted no effect concentration [PNEC], tolerance, application [uncertainty] factors, risk characterization) relative to three different tiered, literative levels of ERA: Problem Formulation, Screening Level ERA (SLERA), and Detailed Level ERA (DLERA). Although data gaps remain, a great deal of progress has been made in the last three years, forming the basis for substantial improvements to ERA for metals.

All data in IMIS is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors