Flanders Marine Institute

Platform for marine research

In:

IMIS

Publications | Institutes | Persons | Datasets | Projects | Maps
report an error in this recordbasket (0): add | show Printer-friendly version

Flow interaction with dynamic vegetation patches: Implications for biogeomorphic evolution of a tidal landscape
Vandenbruwaene, W.; Temmerman, S.; Bouma, T.J.; Klaassen, P.C.; de Vries, M.B.; Callaghan, D.P.; van Steeg, P.; Dekker, F.; van Duren, L.A.; Martini, E.; Balke, T.; Biermans, G.; Schoelynck, J.; Meire, P. (2011). Flow interaction with dynamic vegetation patches: Implications for biogeomorphic evolution of a tidal landscape. J. Geophys. Res. 116: F01008. dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JF001788
In: Journal of Geophysical Research. American Geophysical Union: Washington DC. ISSN 0148-0227, more
Peer reviewed article

Available in Authors 
    VLIZ: Open Repository 223055 [ OMA ]

Keyword
    Marine

Authors  Top 
  • Vandenbruwaene, W., more
  • Temmerman, S., more
  • Bouma, T.J., more
  • Klaassen, P.C.
  • de Vries, M.B., more
  • Callaghan, D.P.
  • van Steeg, P.
  • Dekker, F.
  • van Duren, L.A., more
  • Martini, E.
  • Balke, T.
  • Biermans, G., more
  • Schoelynck, J., more
  • Meire, P., more

Abstract
    Feedback between vegetation growth, water flow, and landform is important for the biogeomorphic evolution of many landscapes, such as tidal marshes, alluvial rivers, and hillslopes. While experimental studies often focus on flow reduction within static homogeneous vegetation, we concentrate on flow acceleration around and between dynamically growing vegetation patches that colonize an initially bare landscape, with specific application to Spartina anglica, a pioneer of intertidal flats. Spartina patches were placed in a large-scale flow facility of 16 × 26 m, simulating the growth of two vegetation patches by increasing the patch diameter (D = 1–3 m) and decreasing the interpatch distance (d = 2.3–0 m). We quantified that the amount of flow acceleration next to vegetation patches, and the distance from the patch where maximum flow acceleration occurs, increases with increasing patch size. In between the patches, the accelerated flow pattern started to interact as soon as D/d = 0.43–0.67. As the patches grew further, the flow acceleration increased until D/d = 6.67–10, from which the flow acceleration between the patches was suppressed, and the two patches started to act as one. These findings are in accordance with theory on flow around and between nonpermeable structures; however, the threshold D/d values found here for permeable vegetation patches are higher than those for nonpermeable structures. The reported flow interactions with dynamic vegetation patches will be essential to further understanding of the larger-scale biogeomorphic evolution of landscapes formed by flowing water, such as tidal flats, floodplain rivers, and hillslopes.

 Top | Authors