IMIS | Flanders Marine Institute
 

Flanders Marine Institute

Platform for marine research

IMIS

Publications | Institutes | Persons | Datasets | Projects | Maps
[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Printer-friendly version

Perception and communication of flood risks: a systematic review of empirical research
Kellens, W.; Terpstra, T.; De Maeyer, P. (2013). Perception and communication of flood risks: a systematic review of empirical research. Risk Analysis 33(1): 24-49. dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01844.x
In: Risk Analysis: An International Journal. Blackwell Scientific Publishers: New York. ISSN 0272-4332, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in Authors 

Author keywords
    Flood risk; literature review; risk communication; risk perception

Authors  Top 
  • Kellens, W., more
  • Terpstra, T.
  • De Maeyer, P., more

Abstract
    Flood hazards are the most common and destructive of all natural disasters. For decades, experts have been examining how flood losses can be mitigated. Just as in other risk domains, the study of risk perception and risk communication has gained increasing interest in flood risk management. Because of this research growth, a review of the state of the art in this domain is believed necessary. The review comprises 57 empirically based peer-reviewed articles on flood risk perception and communication from the Web of Science and Scopus databases. The characteristics of these articles are listed in a comprehensive table, presenting research design, research variables, and key findings. From this review, it follows that the majority of studies are of exploratory nature and have not applied any of the theoretical frameworks that are available in social science research. Consequently, a methodological standardization in measuring and analyzing people's flood risk perceptions and their adaptive behaviors is hardly present. This heterogeneity leads to difficulties in comparing results among studies. It is also shown that theoretical and empirical studies on flood risk communication are nearly nonexistent. The article concludes with a summary on methodological issues in the fields of flood-risk perception and flood-risk communication and proposes an agenda for future research.

All data in IMIS is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors