IMIS | Flanders Marine Institute
 

Flanders Marine Institute

Platform for marine research

IMIS

Publications | Institutes | Persons | Datasets | Projects | Maps
[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Printer-friendly version

Landscape-scale flow patterns over a vegetated tidal marsh and an unvegetated tidal flat: implications for the landform properties of the intertidal floodplain
Vandenbruwaene, W.; Schwarz, C.; Bouma, T.; Meire, P.; Temmerman, S. (2015). Landscape-scale flow patterns over a vegetated tidal marsh and an unvegetated tidal flat: implications for the landform properties of the intertidal floodplain. Geomorphology (Amst.) 231: 40-52. hdl.handle.net/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.11.020
In: Geomorphology. Elsevier: Amsterdam; New York; Oxford; Tokyo. ISSN 0169-555X, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in Authors 

Keywords
    Flow patterns; Landforms; Tidal channels; Tidal flats; Tidal marshes; Vegetation
Author keywords
    Intertidal platform; Intertidal landscape

Authors  Top 
  • Vandenbruwaene, W., more
  • Schwarz, C., more
  • Bouma, T., more

Abstract
    Vegetation is increasingly recognized as an important control on flow and landformpatterns inmany landscape types. Field studies on the landscape-scale effect of vegetation in fluvial and tidal floodplains are relatively scarce while insights are especially based on flume and numerical models. Large-scale flow patterns and landforms were measured on a vegetated tidal marsh and unvegetated tidal flat, in particular dynamic changes in twodimensional water surface slopes, flow velocities and directions on an extensive network of locations. It was found that during flooding and drainage of the vegetated tidal marsh, the flow was concentrated in and routed through bare tidal channels, whereas on the unvegetated tidal flat more homogeneous sheet flow occurred. On the marsh the peak flow velocities were lower on the vegetated platform (b0.1 m/s) compared to their adjacent tidal channels (0.3-1m/s),while on the bare tidal flat the channel and platformflow velocities were not significantly different from each other (0.1-0.4m/s). These differences in flow patterns have important implications for the landform differences between vegetated and bare tidal floodplains: (1) for tidal channels with channel widths smaller than 10 m, width-to-depth ratios (=ß) were smaller for the tidal marsh channels (ß ~3) than for the tidal flat channels (ß ~9) (due to flowconcentration towards the channels in the marsh); and (2) the vegetated marsh platform exhibits a clear levee-basin topography (due to vegetation-induced platform flooding from the channels), while there is no levee-basin topography on the bare flat (due to sheet flow). This study not only emphasizes previous findings on the direct effect of vegetation, acting as frictional constraints on flow in tidal marshes, it also suggests that the indirect effect of vegetation, namely its induced micro-topography, influences the flooding and drainage behavior of marsh systems potentially altering feedbacks caused by direct vegetation effects.

All data in IMIS is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors