IMIS | Flanders Marine Institute
 

Flanders Marine Institute

Platform for marine research

IMIS

Publications | Institutes | Persons | Datasets | Projects | Maps
[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Printer-friendly version

Landing the blame: The influence of EU Member States on quota setting
Carpenter, G.; Kleinjans, R.; Villasante, S.; O'Leary, B.C. (2016). Landing the blame: The influence of EU Member States on quota setting. Mar. Policy 64: 9-15. hdl.handle.net/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.11.001
In: Marine Policy. Pergamon: Guildford. ISSN 0308-597X, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in Authors 

Keywords
    Total allowable catch; Marine
Author keywords
    Decision-making processes; Common Fisherie Policy; Political economy

Authors  Top 
  • Carpenter, G.
  • Kleinjans, R.
  • Villasante, S.
  • O'Leary, B.C.

Abstract
    Fisheries in European Union (EU) waters have been managed under the Common Fisheries Policy since 1983. The main regulatory tool in EU fisheries management is the use of Total Allowable Catches (TACs). In principle, TACs are set according to biological scientific advice provided by the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) which recommends catch limits with the objective of maximising catches in a sustainable manner. The objective of this paper is to compare TACs set by the EU and its Member States between 2001 and 2015 with those recommended by ICES in their annual scientific advice in order to (a) investigate the level of compliance with scientific advice by the European Council and, (b) consider whether particular Member States have received more TACs above advice than others. For the time-series analysed, the European Council set TACs above scientific advice by an average of 20% per year, with around 7 out of every 10 TACs exceeding advice. Of all Member States, Denmark and the United Kingdom received the highest TACs in volume above scientific advice. Relative to the size of their TAC however, Spain and Portugal exceeded advice by the greatest percentage. Greater transparency is required to determine what takes place during the closed door negotiations and to improve the fishery sustainability credentials of the EU and its Member States.

All data in IMIS is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors