IMIS | Flanders Marine Institute
 

Flanders Marine Institute

Platform for marine research

IMIS

Publications | Institutes | Persons | Datasets | Projects | Maps
[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Printer-friendly version

Quantifying particle dispersal in aquatic sediments at short time scales: model selection
Meysman, F.J.R.; Malyuga, V.S.; Boudreau, B.P.; Middelburg, J.J. (2008). Quantifying particle dispersal in aquatic sediments at short time scales: model selection. Aquat. Biol. 2(3): 239-254. dx.doi.org/10.3354/ab00054
In: Aquatic Biology. Inter-Research: Oldendorf/Luhe. ISSN 1864-7782, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Keyword
    Marine
Author keywords
    bioturbation; diffusion; luminophores; modelling; continuous-time randomwalk

Authors  Top 
  • Meysman, F.J.R.
  • Malyuga, V.S.
  • Boudreau, B.P.
  • Middelburg, J.J.

Abstract
    In a pulse-tracer experiment, a layer of tracer particles is added to the sediment-water interface, and the down-mixing of these particles is followed over a short time scale. Here, we compared different models (biodiffusion, telegraph, CTRW) to analyse the resulting tracer depth profiles. The biodiffusion model is widely applied, but entails 2 problems: (1) infinite propagation speed-the infinitely fast propagation of tracer to depth, and (2) infinitely short waiting times-mixing events follow each other infinitely fast. We show that the problem of waiting times is far more relevant to tracer studies than the problem of propagation speed. The key issue in pulse-tracer experiments is that models should explicitly account for a finite waiting time between mixing events. The telegraph equation has a finite propagation speed, but it still assumes infinitely short waiting times, and, hence, it does not form a suitable alternative to the biodiffusion model. Therefore, we advance the continuous-time random walk (CTRW), which explicitly accounts for finite waiting times between mixing events, as a suitable description of bioturbation. CTRW models are able to cope with lateral spatial heterogeneity in reworking, which is a crucial feature of bioturbation at short time scales. We show how existing bioturbation models (biodiffusion model, telegraph equation, non-local exchange model) can be considered as special cases of the CTRW model. Accordingly, the CTRW model is not a new bioturbation model, but a generalization of existing models.

All data in IMIS is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors