IMIS | Flanders Marine Institute

Flanders Marine Institute

Platform for marine research


Publications | Institutes | Persons | Datasets | Projects | Maps
[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Printer-friendly version

Pools of chlorophyll and live planktonic diatoms in aphotic marine sediments
Hansen, J.L.S.; Josefson, A.B. (2001). Pools of chlorophyll and live planktonic diatoms in aphotic marine sediments. Mar. Biol. (Berl.) 139(2): 289-299
In: Marine Biology. Springer: Heidelberg; Berlin. ISSN 0025-3162, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

    Aggregation; Aphotic zone; Chlorophylls; Diatoms; Growth; Sea; Sedimentation; Chaetoceros C.G. Ehrenberg, 1844 [WoRMS]; Skeletonema R.K. Greville, 1865 [WoRMS]; Thalassiosira P.T. Cleve, 1873 [WoRMS]; Marine

Authors  Top 
  • Hansen, J.L.S.
  • Josefson, A.B., more

    Chlorophyll a and numbers of live pelagic diatoms were recorded from sediment depth profiles at 11 stations in the oligotrophic Oresund, Denmark, in late June. Extraction efficiency of chlorophyll a analysed fluorometrically did not differ significantly between paired samples of frozen-thawed and fresh sediment. The depth profiles of chlorophyll a could be explained by a diagenetic model involving two different chlorophyll pools: one reactive pool declining exponentially with core depth, and one non-reactive pool of about 1 µg Chl ml-1 wet sediment, being constant with depth. The number of live diatoms, quantified by the dilution-extinction method, and expressed in terms of most probable number (MPN). declined from an average of about 300,000 g-1 in the surface sediment to zero values at a depth of 13 cm. The number of live cells was significantly correlated with the sediment chlorophyll a, and the profiles of live cells as well as reactive chlorophyll followed the same exponential decline with core depth, suggesting that the main source of chlorophyll in the sediment was live pelagic diatoms. Taxonomic composition of diatoms in the sediment, dominated by the pelagic genera Chaetoceros, Thalassiosira and Skeletonema, matched the species composition in the water column 3 months earlier during the spring bloom. Regular recordings of the phytoplankton community in the water column showed that only these specific bloom species could be the source of the sediment content of diatoms and chlorophyll a. Further, the ratios between live cells and chlorophyll a were similar in the sediment and in the spring bloom. A conservative estimate of depth-integrated pools of diatoms in the sediment suggested that about 44% of the total phytoplankton biomass during the spring bloom was still present as live cells in the sediment after 3 months. This indicates that the spring bloom input to the sediment is not degraded immediately by the benthic fauna.

All data in IMIS is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors