IMIS

Publications | Institutes | Persons | Datasets | Projects | Maps
[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

Biological mixing responses to sublethal concentrations of DDT in sediments by Heteromastus filiformis using a 137 Cs marker layer technique
Mulsow, S.; Landrum, P.F.; Robbins, J.A. (2002). Biological mixing responses to sublethal concentrations of DDT in sediments by Heteromastus filiformis using a 137 Cs marker layer technique. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 239: 181-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps239181
In: Marine Ecology Progress Series. Inter-Research: Oldendorf/Luhe. ISSN 0171-8630; e-ISSN 1616-1599, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Keyword
    Marine/Coastal

Authors  Top 
  • Mulsow, S.
  • Landrum, P.F.
  • Robbins, J.A.

Abstract
    Sediment mixing by benthic macroinvertebrates is an important process affecting the fate of sediment-bound and dissolved contaminants in marine environments. A non-invasive, state-of- the-art radiotracer technique was used to study sediment mixing by Heteromastus filiformis (Capitellidae), a common marine head-down deposit feeder, exposed to several sub-lethal concentrations of DDT (0, 5, 10 and 20 µg g-1; control, Treatments 1, 2 and 3). Several horizontal sub-millimeter layers of 137 Cs-labeled clay were deposited approximately every 2 cm in each of 3 replicate sediment columns per treatment; 4 polychaetes were then introduced to each column and the gamma activity of each column was measured vertically using an automated scan detector. Nonlinear least-square fits were applied to obtain parameterized values that were used to determine the mixing rates of each 137 Cs layer over time. A simple diffusion model was used to calculate biological diffusion coefficients (Db) for H. filiformis. Overall mixing rates increased towards the surface. Control and Treatment 1 had higher Db values at the surface compared to Treatments 2 and 3. The Db depth profiles were similar in the control and Treatments 1 and 2, with mixing occurring at the sediment water interface and a subsurface maximum at 10 to 12 cm below this interface. This pattern was not clear in Treatment 3, where Db had the lowest values and decreased with depth. Bioturbation besides mixing of solids also changed the water content throughout the sediment column. Porosity profiles at the end of the experiments increased by 10 to 20% at 10 to 12 cm depths compared to above and below this horizon. The DDT depth concentration profiles decreased towards the surface as a result of the mixing by the benthic macroinvertebrates, clearly indicating removal/uptake by the organism. The feeding rate constant (gammab, % h-1) in the control showed a maximum at 7 to 12 cm. However, the gammab in the treatments was essentially constant with depth. For all treatments and the control, the burial rate (Wb) (downward movement of radiolabeled layers) decreased with depth. The surface layers were buried faster (ANOVA, p < 0.05) in the control than in sediments containing DDT. A sensitivity analysis comparing burial rate, Db, gammab (surface only) and worm weights showed that worm weights and burial rate have the highest fractional rate changes per µg g-1 DDT.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors