IMIS

Publications | Institutes | Persons | Datasets | Projects | Maps
[ report an error in this record ]basket (1): add | show Print this page

one publication added to basket [56724]
Retention of particulate matter by macrophytes in a first-order stream
Horvath, T.G. (2004). Retention of particulate matter by macrophytes in a first-order stream. Aquat. Bot. 78(1): 27-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2003.09.003
In: Aquatic Botany. Elsevier Science: Tokyo; Oxford; New York; London; Amsterdam. ISSN 0304-3770; e-ISSN 1879-1522, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Author 

Keywords
    Flora > Aquatic organisms > Aquatic plants
    Motion > Fluid motion > Fluid flow > Flow around objects
    Organic matter > Particulates > Particulate organic matter
    Retention
    Retention
    Velocity > Current velocity > Stream flow rate
    Water bodies > Inland waters > Rivers
    Germany, Hessen, Breitenbach R.
    Fresh water
Author keywords
    streams; retention; macrophytes; organic matter; CPOM

Author  Top 
  • Horvath, T.G.

Abstract
    Retention of coarse particulate organic matter (CPOM) in streams is affected by channel complexity, especially three-dimensional structures in stream channels. Much attention has focused on woody debris as retention structures, but macrophytes should function similarly. Retention and flow characteristics were measured in 5 m long reaches at four-replicate sites in the Breitenbach (Hessen, Germany). CPOM retention was measured by releasing chips of paper (6 mm diameter) as analog CPOM. Triplicate releases (200 chips each) were done before and after submerged, emergent and overhanging macrophytes were removed. Discharge ranged between 3 and 4.5 l s-1 during the experimental releases. Macrophyte biomass removed was 3.047, 3.012, 0.164, and 1.392 kg m-2 (fresh weight) respectively from sites 1 to 4. Instantaneous retention rates, calculated with an exponential decay function, were significantly higher (P < 0.001) with macrophytes than without macrophytes (0.8 ± 0.2 versus 0.2 ± 0.1). Velocity also was significantly reduced by macrophyte presence (P < 0.001). Macrophyte biomass was a significant predictor of retention (P < 0.001), whereas discharge was not (P = 0.3). Hence, retention appears to be positively related to macrophyte biomass. Macrophytes in the Breitenbach increase retention by forming effective sieve-like structures in the stream physically trapping CPOM and by reducing water velocity.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Author