IMIS

Publications | Institutes | Persons | Datasets | Projects | Maps
[ report an error in this record ]basket (1): add | show Print this page

one publication added to basket [74947]
Jellyfish abundance and climatic variation: contrasting responses in oceanographically distinct regions of the North Sea, and possible implications for fisheries
Lynam, C.P.; Hay, S.J.; Brierley, A.S. (2005). Jellyfish abundance and climatic variation: contrasting responses in oceanographically distinct regions of the North Sea, and possible implications for fisheries. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 85(3): 435-450. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0025315405011380
In: Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Cambridge University Press/Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom: Cambridge. ISSN 0025-3154; e-ISSN 1469-7769, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Keywords
    Abundance
    Aquatic communities > Plankton > Zooplankton
    Climatic changes
    Impact
    Impact
    Impact
    Interspecific relationships > Predation
    Organisms > Eukaryotes > Animals > Invertebrates > Cnidaria > Jellyfish
    Aurelia aurita (Linnaeus, 1758) [WoRMS]; Cyanea capillata (Linnaeus, 1758) [WoRMS]; Cyanea lamarckii Péron & Lesueur, 1810 [WoRMS]; Medusae
    ANE, North Sea [Marine Regions]
    Marine/Coastal

Authors  Top 
  • Lynam, C.P.
  • Hay, S.J.
  • Brierley, A.S.

Abstract
    Jellyfish medusae prey on zooplankton and may impact fish recruitment both directly (top-down control) and indirectly (through competition). Abundances of Aureliaaurita,Cyanealamarckii and Cyaneacapillata medusae (Scyphozoa) in the North Sea appear to be linked to large-scale inter-annual climatic change, as quantified by the North Atlantic Oscillation Index (NAOI), the Barents Sea-Ice Index (BSII) and changes in the latitude of the Gulf Stream North Wall (GSNW). Hydroclimatic forcing may thus be an important factor influencing the abundance of gelatinous zooplankton and may modulate the scale of any ecosystem impact of jellyfish. The population responses are probably also affected by local variability in the environment manifested in intra-annual changes in temperature, salinity, current strength/direction and prey abundance. Aureliaaurita and C.lamarckii in the north-west and south-east North Sea exhibited contrasting relationships to change in the NAOI and BSII: north of Scotland, where the North Sea borders the Atlantic, positive relationships were evident between the abundance of scyphomedusae (data from 1974 to 1986, except 1975) and the indices; whereas west of northern Denmark, a region much less affected by Atlantic inflow, negative relationships were found (data from 1973 to 1983, except 1974). Weaker negative relationships with the NAOI were also found in an intermediate region, east of Scotland, for the abundance of A.aurita and C.capillata medusae (1971 to 1982). East of Shetland, the abundance of jellyfish was not correlated directly with the NAOI but, in contrast to all other regions, the abundances of A.aurita and C.lamarckii (1971 to 1986, not 1984) were found to correlate negatively with changes in the GSNW, which itself was significantly positively correlated to the NAOI with a two year lag. On this evidence, we suggest that, for jellyfish, there exist three regions of the North Sea with distinct environmental processes governing species abundance: one north of Scotland, another east of Shetland, and a more southerly group (i.e. east of Scotland and west of northern Denmark). Impacts by jellyfish are likely to vary regionally, and ecosystem management may benefit from considering this spatial variability.


All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors