Difference between revisions of "Heavy metal content of mussels in the Western Scheldt estuary"

From Coastal Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(References)
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
<u>'''Content of the study'''</u>
 
<u>'''Content of the study'''</u>
  
The study aimed to compare the [[heavy metals|heavy metal]] content of mussels (collected in 2002) in the Eastern Scheldt bay with those in the Western Scheldt estuary. This way they assessed whether heavy metal levels have indeed gone down in the Eastern Scheldt. The mussels were sampled in a land to sea gradient, which in the Western Scheldt coincided with a gradient of salinity and pollution.  
+
The study aimed to compare the [[heavy metals|heavy metal]] content of mussels (collected in 2002) in the Eastern Scheldt bay with those in the Western Scheldt estuary. This way they assessed whether heavy metal levels have indeed gone down in the Eastern Scheldt. The mussels were sampled in a land to sea gradient, which in the Western Scheldt coincided with a gradient of [[salinity]] and [[pollution]].  
  
 
[[Image:Belgian-mussels.jpg|thumb|right|300px| <div style="text-align: center;">
 
[[Image:Belgian-mussels.jpg|thumb|right|300px| <div style="text-align: center;">
Line 16: Line 16:
 
<u>'''Main results of the study'''</u>
 
<u>'''Main results of the study'''</u>
  
Surprisingly, for most metals, concentrations in mussels the Eastern Scheldt bay were equally high as those in the Western Scheldt estuary. Concentrations were: arsenicum: 7 - 20 µg/g , cobalt: 0.8 - 2.2 µg/g, copper: 5 - 22 µg/g, manganese: 5 - 20 µg/g, lead: 2 - 6.1 µg/g, cadmium 1 - 1.8 µg/g, chrome: 1 - 2 µg/g, iron: 70 - 200 µg/g, nickel: 0.5 - 5 µg/g, zinc: 50 - 150 µg/g (al in µg metal/ g mussel, wet weight). Heavy metal concentrations in mussels showed both in the Western Scheldt estuary as in the Eastern Scheldt bay a decreasing trend towards the sea.
+
Surprisingly, for most metals, concentrations in mussels the Eastern Scheldt bay were equally high as those in the Western Scheldt estuary. Concentrations were: arsenicum: 7 - 20 µg/g, cobalt: 0.8 - 2.2 µg/g, [[copper]]: 5 - 22 µg/g, manganese: 5 - 20 µg/g, [[lead]]: 2 - 6.1 µg/g, [[cadmium]] 1 - 1.8 µg/g, chrome: 1 - 2 µg/g, iron: 70 - 200 µg/g, nickel: 0.5 - 5 µg/g, [[zinc]]: 50 - 150 µg/g (al in µg metal/ g mussel, [[wet weight]]). Heavy metal concentrations in mussels showed both in the Western Scheldt estuary as in the Eastern Scheldt bay a decreasing trend towards the sea.
  
 
The relatively low  concentrations (compared to the Eastern Scheldt) in the Western Scheldt might be related to recent Belgian measures to improve the water quality. The high concentrations in the Eastern Scheldt were unexpected since water pollution has been drastically reduced. Presumably metals stored in the soil became again available for uptake by mussels. Changing conditions can cause soil particles and associated metals to resuspend, and be taken up by mussels.  
 
The relatively low  concentrations (compared to the Eastern Scheldt) in the Western Scheldt might be related to recent Belgian measures to improve the water quality. The high concentrations in the Eastern Scheldt were unexpected since water pollution has been drastically reduced. Presumably metals stored in the soil became again available for uptake by mussels. Changing conditions can cause soil particles and associated metals to resuspend, and be taken up by mussels.  
 
When analyzing heavy metal concentrations in the soil, it was shown that although the total levels of heavy metals were higher in the Western Scheldt, the level of heavy metals in the sediments available for uptake by mussels was higher in the Eastern Scheldt.  
 
When analyzing heavy metal concentrations in the soil, it was shown that although the total levels of heavy metals were higher in the Western Scheldt, the level of heavy metals in the sediments available for uptake by mussels was higher in the Eastern Scheldt.  
  
The study concluded that the uptake and accumulation of heavy metals don't only depend on the total environmental pollution, but can by affected by lots of other factors. Therefore, residual pollution can have a long term effect on biota, even long after implementation of measures to reduce it.<ref name="pub">[http://www.vliz.be/imis/imis.php?module=ref&refid=118292 Mubiana, V.K.; Blust, R. (2006). Metal content of marine mussels from Western Scheldt Estuary and nearby protected Marine Bay, the Netherlands: impact of past and present contamination. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 77(2): 203-210]</ref>
+
The study concluded that the uptake and [[bioaccumulation|accumulation]] of heavy metals don't only depend on the total environmental pollution, but can by affected by lots of other factors. Therefore, residual pollution can have a long term effect on [[biota]], even long after implementation of measures to reduce it.<ref name="pub">[http://www.vliz.be/imis/imis.php?module=ref&refid=118292 Mubiana, V.K.; Blust, R. (2006). Metal content of marine mussels from Western Scheldt Estuary and nearby protected Marine Bay, the Netherlands: impact of past and present contamination. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 77(2): 203-210]</ref>
  
  
Line 27: Line 27:
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
  
 +
{{author
 +
|AuthorID=19826
 +
|AuthorFullName=Daphnis De Pooter
 +
|AuthorName=Daphnisd}}
  
 
[[Category:North Sea]]
 
[[Category:North Sea]]
 
[[Category:Coastal and marine pollution]]
 
[[Category:Coastal and marine pollution]]

Revision as of 10:34, 13 March 2013

Mussels © Decleer
Context of the study

Since 1987, the Eastern Scheldt estuary has been blocked by dams (the DeltaWorks project) to create a barrier against flooding. Because of this blockade, the Eastern Scheldt changed from an estuary into a protected marine bay. Input of chemical contaminants from land decreased drastically, although heavy metals might still persist in the soils. The adjacent Western Scheldt drains through the most populated and industrial regions of Belgium, The Netherlands and France, making it one most polluted rivers of Europe and one of the major sources of heavy metals in the North Sea. [1]

Content of the study

The study aimed to compare the heavy metal content of mussels (collected in 2002) in the Eastern Scheldt bay with those in the Western Scheldt estuary. This way they assessed whether heavy metal levels have indeed gone down in the Eastern Scheldt. The mussels were sampled in a land to sea gradient, which in the Western Scheldt coincided with a gradient of salinity and pollution.

Mussel farms near the Belgian coast (Nieuwpoort) © Vandepitte

Main results of the study

Surprisingly, for most metals, concentrations in mussels the Eastern Scheldt bay were equally high as those in the Western Scheldt estuary. Concentrations were: arsenicum: 7 - 20 µg/g, cobalt: 0.8 - 2.2 µg/g, copper: 5 - 22 µg/g, manganese: 5 - 20 µg/g, lead: 2 - 6.1 µg/g, cadmium 1 - 1.8 µg/g, chrome: 1 - 2 µg/g, iron: 70 - 200 µg/g, nickel: 0.5 - 5 µg/g, zinc: 50 - 150 µg/g (al in µg metal/ g mussel, wet weight). Heavy metal concentrations in mussels showed both in the Western Scheldt estuary as in the Eastern Scheldt bay a decreasing trend towards the sea.

The relatively low concentrations (compared to the Eastern Scheldt) in the Western Scheldt might be related to recent Belgian measures to improve the water quality. The high concentrations in the Eastern Scheldt were unexpected since water pollution has been drastically reduced. Presumably metals stored in the soil became again available for uptake by mussels. Changing conditions can cause soil particles and associated metals to resuspend, and be taken up by mussels. When analyzing heavy metal concentrations in the soil, it was shown that although the total levels of heavy metals were higher in the Western Scheldt, the level of heavy metals in the sediments available for uptake by mussels was higher in the Eastern Scheldt.

The study concluded that the uptake and accumulation of heavy metals don't only depend on the total environmental pollution, but can by affected by lots of other factors. Therefore, residual pollution can have a long term effect on biota, even long after implementation of measures to reduce it.[1]


References

The main author of this article is Daphnis De Pooter
Please note that others may also have edited the contents of this article.

Citation: Daphnis De Pooter (2013): Heavy metal content of mussels in the Western Scheldt estuary. Available from http://www.coastalwiki.org/wiki/Heavy_metal_content_of_mussels_in_the_Western_Scheldt_estuary [accessed on 28-03-2024]