Difference between revisions of "OSPAR eutrophication assessment"

From Coastal Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Category III: Indirect effects of nutrient enrichment)
(Macrophytes)
Line 190: Line 190:
  
  
===Macrophytes===
 
Shifts in species (from long-lived species like eel-grass to nuisance short-lived species like Ulva, Enteromorpha) form an important area-specific indicator/assessment parameter in shallow waters, estuaries and embayments. In some of these areas, specific assessment levels (reduced depth distribution, and increased area coverage with nuisance species) are mentioned.
 
  
  
  
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
===Macrophytes===
 +
Shifts in species (from long-lived species like eel-grass to nuisance short-lived species like Ulva, Enteromorpha) form an important area-specific indicator/assessment parameter in shallow waters, estuaries and embayments. In some of these areas, specific assessment levels (reduced depth distribution, and increased area coverage with nuisance species) are mentioned.
  
 
== Category III: Indirect effects of nutrient enrichment ==
 
== Category III: Indirect effects of nutrient enrichment ==

Revision as of 13:37, 18 February 2013

Generic conceptual framework to assess eutrophication in all categories of surface waters ©OSPAR (Common Procedure for the Identification of the Eutrophication Status of the OSPAR Maritime Area (Reference number: 2005-3)

Coastal eutrophication is a growing marine environmental problem in Europe and the need for more effective monitoring and control measures is increasing. The OSPAR Commission adopted the Common Procedure for the Identification of the Eutrophication Status of the maritime area in 1997. OSPAR committed all members to reduce phosphorus and nitrogen inputs into the maritime areas and 'to combat eutrophication to achieve a healthy environment where eutrophication does not occur'.

The Common Procedure is used to assess the eutrophication status of the OSPAR maritime area in a harmonized way. This is based on classifications in terms of the following types of areas: Non-problem Areas, Potential Problem Areas and Problem Areas.

The Common Procedure includes the main parameters involved in eutrophication processess which are roughly differentiated in four categories (see figure).

  • Category I: Nutrient enrichment
  • Category II: Direct effects of nutrient enrichment
  • Category III: Indirect effects of nutrient enrichment
  • Category IV: Other effects of nutrient enrichment














Category I: Nutrient enrichment

Introduction

The major causes of nutrient enrichment in coastal areas are associated with the need to satisfy human nutrition and diet by the use of fertilizers (anthropogenic nutrient loads). Nutrients in fertilizer may reach the estuary in several ways: through accidental release during production and transportation, by runoff from farm fields into surface or ground waters, or by incorporation into the food web via uptake by plants and consumption of plants by humans and livestock. Nutrients such as nitrates and phosphates are needed for the biomass production of phytoplankton and micro-and macrophytes (e.g. seagrasses, alges) and are the most common single factor causing eutrophication.


Table1: Nutrient enrichment
Nutrient concentration (µmol/l) Assessment
Ammonium1 (NH4+) Throughout the year
Nitrate2 (NO3-) Throughout the year
Nitrite3 (NO2-) Throughout the year
Phosphate (PO43-) Throughout the year
SiO4 (SiO44-) Throughout the year
Dissolved Inorganic Nitrogen (DIN) (1+2+3) Winter*
Dissolved Inorganic Phosphor (DIP) Winter*
Total Nitrogen (Includes all forms of nitrogen compounds) Calculated from all seasons
Total Phosphor (Includes all forms of phosphor compounds Calculated from all seasons
*During phytoplankton blooms, inorganic nutrients in surface layers may be almost completely consumed, leading to nutrient limitation. This results in a large seasonal variability of nutrient concentrations. For this reason DIN and DIP are usually measured and assessed during winter, when biological activity is lowest (highest nutrient concentrations).





















Nitrogen

Nitrogen is used by living organisms to produce a number of complex organic molecules such as amino acids, proteins and nucleic acids. The store of nitrogen found in the atmosphere, where it exists mainly as a gas (mainly N2), plays an important role for life. Other major stores include organic matter in soil and the oceans. Nitrogen is often the most limiting nutrient for plant growth. This occurs because most plants can only take up nitrogen in two solid forms: ammonium ion (NH4+) and the nitrate ion (NO3-). Most plants obtain the nitrogen they need as inorganic nitrate from the soil solution. Ammonium is used less by plants for uptake because in large concentrations it is extremely toxic. The stimulation of plant growth by nitrates may result in eutrophication, especially due to algae.

Phosphorus

The primary biological importance of phosphates is as a component of nucleotides, which serve as energy storage within celles (ATP) or when linked together form the nucleic acids (DNA,RNA). Most of world's phosphorus is locked up in rocks and can only be released by weathering. A lot of the phosphorus that runs off into the ocean also gets buried into the ocean floor because it precipitates into solid form and settles to the bottom as sediment. Phosphorus is only available to organisms in small quantities. For this reason, phosphorus is a limiting factor for plant growth. Their presence in water is due to detergents, fertilizers and biological processes. An excess of phosphate will stimulate the growth of algae and aquatic plants.

Silica

Diatoms are the predominant siliceous organisms in the marine environment and are a major component of the phytoplankton community. Diatoms accumulate silica (SiO2) as a structural element in their cell walls. The silica need of a diatom may be so great relative to the silica concentration of seawater, that it restricts diatom growth.

Measuring devices

Category II: Direct effects of nutrient enrichment

Chlorophyll a (µg/l)

Structure of chlorophyll a

Chlorophyll is bound with the living cells of algae and other phytoplankton. It is a key biochemical component in the molecular apparatus that is responsible for photosynthesis, the critical processes in which the energy from sunlight is used to produce oxygen. Chlorophyll a is the most abundant form of chlorophyll within photosynthetic organisms and gives plants their green color.

Chlorophyll a is an indicator for algal biomass and its spatial and temporal varieties. Monitoring chlorophyll levels is a direct way of tracking algal growth. Surface waters that have high chlorophyll conditions are typically high in nutrients, generally phosphorus and nitrogen. These nutrients cause the algae to grow or bloom. Thus, chlorofyll measurements can be utilized as an indirect indicator of nutrient levels.

Phytoplankton indicator species (cells/l; species composition)

Two types of area-specific phytoplankton indicator species can be distinguished:

  • Nuisance species, forming dense “blooms”
  • Toxic species, already toxic at low concentration

Shifts in species composition from diatoms to flagellates (some of which are toxic) could indicate eutrophication. The composition of phytoplankton should be compared with area-specific reference conditions and could for example be expressed by the ratio of diatoms to flagellates.

Table1: Phytoplankton indicator species
Species Type Ocurrence/period of bloom
Phaeocystis spp. Nuisance Spring-summer
Noctiluca scintillans Nuisance Spring
Chrysochromulina polylepis Toxic (fish/benthos) Spring
Gymnodinium mikimotoi Toxic, PSP mussel infection Late summer-autumn
Alexandrium spp. Toxic, PSP mussel infection May-june
Dinophysis spp. Toxic, DSP mussel infection Late summer-autumn
Prorocentrum spp. Toxic, DSP mussel infection
Fibrocapsa japonica Toxic (fish, marine mammals)
Chatonella spp. Toxic (fish)









Macrophytes

Shifts in species (from long-lived species like eel-grass to nuisance short-lived species like Ulva, Enteromorpha) form an important area-specific indicator/assessment parameter in shallow waters, estuaries and embayments. In some of these areas, specific assessment levels (reduced depth distribution, and increased area coverage with nuisance species) are mentioned.

Category III: Indirect effects of nutrient enrichment

Oxygen deficiency

Increased decomposition of organic matter (dead or decaying algae; oxygen is consumed by the microbial processes responsible for the degradation of organic matter) and long-term nutrients and associated organic matter enrichment can lead to oxygen deficiency. The degree of oxygen deficiency is widely used as an indirect effect for nutrient enrichment. Oxygen depletion may result in hypoxia (low oxygen) or even in anoxia (absence of oxygen).

Assessment levels of the various degrees of oxygen deficiency:

  • < 2 mg/l : acute toxic (ca. 75% deficiency)
  • 4-5 mg/l : ca. 50% deficiency
  • < 5-6 mg/l: deficient

Oxygen concentrations above 6 mg/l are considered to cause no problems.

Zoobenthos and fish

A distinction can be made between acute toxicity kills directly related to oxygen deficiency and/or toxic blooms, and long-term changes in zoobenthos species composition as a result of long-term increased eutrophication.

Category IV: Other effects of nutrient enrichment

Algal toxins

Diarrhoeic shellfish poisoning (DSP) and paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) mussel infection events are a relevant assessment parameter in relation to potential toxic algal species in areas where cultivated or wild shellfish stocks are harvested for human consumption. This parameter should be based on coherent monitoring on phytoplankton eutrophication indicator species (nuisance and/or toxic)(Category II)

References

  1. OSPAR (2005), Agreement on the Eutrophication Monitoring Programme(Reference number: 2005-4).EUC 2005 Summary Record – EUC 05/13/1, Annex 6.
  2. Ulrich Claussen, Wanda Zevenboom, Uwe Brockmann, Dilek Topcu and Peter Bot (2009). Assessment of the eutrophication status of transitional, coastal and marine waters within OSPAR. Hydrobiologia. 629, 49-58.
  3. OSPAR (2005), Common Procedure for the Identification of the Eutrophication Status of the OSPAR Maritime Area (Reference number: 2005-3).EUC 2005 Summary Record – EUC 05/13/1, Annex 5 as amended and endorsed by OSPAR 2005 Summary Record - OSPAR 05/21/1, §§ 6.2-6.5 and Annex 6.
  4. HELCOM (2009), Eutrophication in the Baltic Sea – An integrated thematic assessment of the effects of nutrient enrichment and eutrophication in the Baltic Sea region. Balt. Sea Environ. Proc. No. 115B.
  5. Jesper H. Andersen, Louise Schlüter and Gunni Aertebjerg (2006). Coastal eutrophication: recent developments in definitions and implications for monitoring strategies. Journal of Plankton Research. 28 (7), 621-628.