Difference between revisions of "Talk:Coast erosion"
From Coastal Wiki
Dronkers J (talk | contribs) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ==Review by Dominic Reeve (January 2013)== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
==Merge into coastal erosion== | ==Merge into coastal erosion== | ||
I have merged this stub into [[coastal erosion]]. Links have been checked. [[User:BvL|BvL]] 12:19, 15 December 2007 (Romance Standard Time) | I have merged this stub into [[coastal erosion]]. Links have been checked. [[User:BvL|BvL]] 12:19, 15 December 2007 (Romance Standard Time) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | As a definition this page should be and is short. The page provides links to an interesting case study - however the overall balance is not even. | ||
+ | I would expect to see references/links to general references such as the CEM, CIRIA Beach Management Manual. It is good to see links to ecological and socio-economic impacts of erosion, as well as the physical processes. It is perhaps a good place to have a photograph of erosion. |
Revision as of 23:17, 31 January 2013
Review by Dominic Reeve (January 2013)
Merge into coastal erosion
I have merged this stub into coastal erosion. Links have been checked. BvL 12:19, 15 December 2007 (Romance Standard Time)
As a definition this page should be and is short. The page provides links to an interesting case study - however the overall balance is not even.
I would expect to see references/links to general references such as the CEM, CIRIA Beach Management Manual. It is good to see links to ecological and socio-economic impacts of erosion, as well as the physical processes. It is perhaps a good place to have a photograph of erosion.