IMIS

Publications | Institutes | Persons | Datasets | Projects | Maps
[ report an error in this record ]basket (1): add | show Print this page

one publication added to basket [28476]
Lepidochronology and internodal length methods for studying Posidonia oceanica growth: are they compatible?
Peirano, A. (2002). Lepidochronology and internodal length methods for studying Posidonia oceanica growth: are they compatible? Aquat. Bot. 74(2): 175-180. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3770(02)00078-5
In: Aquatic Botany. Elsevier Science: Tokyo; Oxford; New York; London; Amsterdam. ISSN 0304-3770; e-ISSN 1879-1522, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Author 

Keywords
    Age determination
    Anatomical structures > Body organs > Plant organs > Rhizomes
    Dating techniques
    Flora > Weeds > Marine organisms > Seaweeds > Sea grass
    Population functions > Growth
    Posidonia oceanica (Linnaeus) Delile, 1813 [WoRMS]
    MED, Ligurian Sea [Marine Regions]
    Marine/Coastal

Author  Top 
  • Peirano, A.

Abstract
    Two techniques to estimate growth of the Mediterranean seagrass Posidonia oceanica are compared. Leaf scale thickness and internodal length of orthotropic rhizomes were measured on the same rhizomes. Yearly cycles from internodal length measurements were in phase with lepidochronological years only after 3 years of rhizome growth. The start of a lepidochronological year roughly corresponded to the yearly maximum of internodal length measurements. Lepidochronology was a more sensitive method for identifying seasonal and yearly cycles. Both methods proved accurate and in agreement when samples exceeded 20 units (rhizomes). A combination of the two methods may improve dating techniques but the limitations should be taken into account when applied to population analysis and to primary production computations.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Author