IMIS

Publications | Institutes | Persons | Datasets | Projects | Maps
[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

Comparison of different otolith shape descriptors and morphometrics for the identification of closely related species of Lutjanus spp. from the Persian Gulf
Sadighzadeh, Z.; Tuset, V.M.; Valinassab, T.; Dadpourd, M.R.; Lombarte, A. (2012). Comparison of different otolith shape descriptors and morphometrics for the identification of closely related species of Lutjanus spp. from the Persian Gulf. Mar. Biol. Res. 8(9): 802-814. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17451000.2012.692163
In: Marine Biology Research. Taylor & Francis: Oslo; Basingstoke. ISSN 1745-1000; e-ISSN 1745-1019, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Keywords
    Analysis > Mathematical analysis > Fourier analysis
    Morphology (animal)
    Otoliths
    Lutjanidae Gill, 1861 [WoRMS]; Lutjanus argentimaculatus (Forsskål, 1775) [WoRMS]; Lutjanus ehrenbergii (Peters, 1869) [WoRMS]; Lutjanus johnii (Bloch, 1792) [WoRMS]; Lutjanus malabaricus (Bloch & Schneider, 1801) [WoRMS]
    ISW, Persian Gulf [Marine Regions]
    Marine/Coastal
Author keywords
    Fourier; Wavelets

Authors  Top 
  • Sadighzadeh, Z.
  • Tuset, V.M.
  • Valinassab, T.
  • Dadpourd, M.R.
  • Lombarte, A.

Abstract
    The anatomical and morphometric (shape indices, contour descriptors and otolith weight) characterizations of sagittal otoliths were investigated in 11 species of Lutjanus spp. inhabiting the Persian Gulf. This is the first study that compares the efficiency of three different image analysis techniques for discriminating species based on the shape of the outer otolith contour, including elliptical Fourier descriptors (EFD), fast Fourier transform (FFT) and wavelet transform (WT). Sagittal otoliths of snappers are morphologically similar with some small specific variations. The use of otolith contour based on wavelets (WT) provided the best results in comparison with the two other methods based on Fourier descriptors, but only the combination of the all three methods (EFD, FFT and WT) was useful to obtain a robust classification of species. The species prediction improved when otolith weight was included. In relation to the shape indices, only the aspect ratio provided a clear grouping of species.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors