IMIS

Publications | Institutes | Persons | Datasets | Projects | Maps
[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

Nutrient content of seagrasses and epiphytes in the northern Gulf of Mexico: evidence of phosphorus and nitrogen limitation
Johnson, M.W.; Heck Jr., K.L.; Fourqurean, J.W. (2006). Nutrient content of seagrasses and epiphytes in the northern Gulf of Mexico: evidence of phosphorus and nitrogen limitation. Aquat. Bot. 85(2): 103-111. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2006.02.003
In: Aquatic Botany. Elsevier Science: Tokyo; Oxford; New York; London; Amsterdam. ISSN 0304-3770; e-ISSN 1879-1522, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Keywords
    Eutrophication
    Nutrients (mineral)
    Halodule wrightii Ascherson, 1868 [WoRMS]; Thalassia testudinum K.D.Koenig, 1805 [WoRMS]
    Marine/Coastal

Authors  Top 
  • Johnson, M.W.
  • Heck Jr., K.L.
  • Fourqurean, J.W.

Abstract
    We examined C:N:P ratios of seagrass leaves and epiphytic algae from the eastern shoreline of Grand Bay (Alabama, USA) and the entire shoreline of Big Lagoon (Florida, USA) during the summer of 2001 and March 2003, and used contour plotting of N:P ratios in both locations to examine spatial trends in our data. Results indicated phosphorus limitation for seagrass and epiphytes in each bay. In addition, C:N, C:P, and N:P ratios in both locations showed differences between summer and wintertime values for seagrasses; however, the only epiphytic elemental ratios to differ were C:P and N:P ratios in Grand Bay. Within Grand Bay, phosphorus limitation was stronger in epiphytes than seagrasses, with the largest amount of variation in N:P ratios occurring adjacent to the only developed land on the shoreline. In Big Lagoon, two distinct areas were present in N:P contour plots: the eastern end of the bay that was influenced by water from the Gulf of Mexico and Santa Rosa Sound, and the western end of the bay that was most influenced by Perdido Bay and a developed area along the northern shoreline. Detection of phosphorus limitation within Big Lagoon was not surprising, as both input sources to Big Lagoon are known to be low in phosphorus. However, phosphorus limitation in Grand Bay was unexpected, as both “feeder systems” (Mobile Bay and the Mississippi Sound) have high ambient phosphorus levels. As a result, C:N:P ratios from seagrasses and epiphytes may not accurately reflect ambient nutrient levels in Grand Bay due to decreased availability of some forms of phosphorus or increased competition for the uptake of phosphorus. Overall, our C:N:P analysis suggested that not only was P limitation greater than N limitation in Grand Bay and Big Lagoon, but patterns of nutrient limitation varied both temporally and geographically for inter- and intra-bay comparisons.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors