IMIS

Publications | Institutes | Persons | Datasets | Projects | Maps
[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

Geochemical and dynamic model of repeated hydrothermal injections in two Mesozoic successions, Provencal Domain, Maritime Alps, SE-France
Salih, N.; Mansurbeg, H.; Préat, A. (2020). Geochemical and dynamic model of repeated hydrothermal injections in two Mesozoic successions, Provencal Domain, Maritime Alps, SE-France. Minerals 10(9): 775. https://hdl.handle.net/10.3390/min10090775
In: Minerals. MDPI: Basel. e-ISSN 2075-163X, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Author keywords
    hydrothermal dolomite; diagenetic settings; optical petrography; geochemical; Triassic-Jurassic successions; Provençal Domain

Authors  Top 
  • Salih, N.
  • Mansurbeg, H.
  • Préat, A., more

Abstract
    A field, petrographic and geochemical study of two Triassic–Jurassic carbonate successions from the Maritime Alps, SE France, indicates that dolomitization is related to episodic fracturing and the flow of hydrothermal fluids. The mechanism governing hydrothermal fluids has been documented with the best possible spatio-temporal resolutions specifying the migration and trapping of hydrothermal fluids as a function of depth. This is rarely reported in the literature, as it requires a very wide range of disciplines from facies analysis (petrography) to very diverse and advanced chemical methods (elemental analysis, isotope geochemistry, microthermometry). In most cases, our different recognized diagenetic phases were mechanically separated on a centimetric scale and analyzed separately. The wide range of the δ18OVPDB and 87Sr/86Sr values of diagenetic carbonates reflect three main diagenetic realms, including: (1) the formation of replacive dolomites (Type I) in the eogenetic realm, (2) formation of coarse to very coarse crystalline saddle dolomites (Types II and Type III) in the shallow to deep burial mesogenetic realm, respectively, and (3) telogenetic formation of a late calcite cement (C1) in the telogenetic realm due to the uplift incursion of meteoric waters. The Triassic dolomites show a lower 87Sr/86Sr ratio (mean = 0.709125) compared to the Jurassic dolomites (mean = 0.710065). The Jurassic calcite (C1J) shows lower Sr isotopic ratios than the Triassic C1T calcite. These are probably linked to the pulses of the seafloor’s hydrothermal activity and to an increase in the continental riverine input during Late Cretaceous and Early Cenozoic times. This study adds a new insight into the burial diagenetic conditions during multiple hydrothermal flow events.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors